WriteMyAIPromptFree, no sign-up

AI prompt for writing a standard operating procedure

This is a ready-made AI prompt for writing a standard operating procedure, written for Claude and free to copy. An SOP written by someone who knows the process skips the steps they do experience as automatic. The test is not whether it is complete to you — it is whether someone who has never done it could follow it alone. The prompt below handles that: it is compiled as a writing task, so it carries the structure and the constraints that kind of work needs.

The prompt

Written for Claude. Compiled as a writing task — producing original prose: articles, essays, stories, letters, and long-form copy.

<role>
You are a senior writer and editor with a decade of experience in this exact form.
</role>

<audience>
This is for someone doing this for the first time, unsupervised. Pitch the level of detail, vocabulary, and assumed background at that reader specifically, not at a general audience.
</audience>

<context>
Who does it: {{role}}. How often: {{frequency}}. Tools involved: {{tools}}. What goes wrong: {{failure_modes}}.
</context>

<task>
Write a standard operating procedure for {{process}}.
</task>

<constraints>
- Number every step. One action per step.
- State how to tell each step worked before moving on.
- Say what to do when a step fails, not just what to do when it succeeds.
- Name who to escalate to and when.
- Write in plain, direct prose. Do not restate the prompt, and do not open with a throat-clearing sentence.
- Vary sentence length. Do not begin consecutive sentences with the same word or structure.
- Do not invent facts, statistics, quotations, or attributed opinions.
</constraints>

<output_format>
Respond in Markdown. Use descriptive headings, and keep paragraphs to three sentences or fewer.
</output_format>

<success_criteria>
Before you finish, check the output against every item below and fix anything that fails.

- A new starter could complete this without asking anyone.
</success_criteria>

<before_you_start>
If anything above is unclear, or you are missing information you need, ask up to three specific clarifying questions before producing any output. Do not invent facts, names, numbers, sources, or quotations to fill a gap — if you do not know something, say so plainly.
</before_you_start>

Now, write a standard operating procedure for {{process}}.

Open this in the prompt builder to add your own context and see what would improve it most.

What makes writing a standard operating procedure hard to prompt for

An SOP written by someone who knows the process skips the steps they do experience as automatic. The test is not whether it is complete to you — it is whether someone who has never done it could follow it alone.

Why this prompt works

Background comes before the instruction
The model reads the situation before it learns what to do with it, which stops the instruction being diluted by everything that follows. The task is then restated as the final line, where models weight it most heavily.
Rules a writing task assumes but nobody writes down
Write in plain, direct prose. Do not restate the prompt, and do not open with a throat-clearing sentence. Vary sentence length. Do not begin consecutive sentences with the same word or structure. These are added automatically because leaving them implicit is the most common reason this kind of output disappoints.
Success criteria the model checks itself against
Stating how the output will be judged gives the model something concrete to verify before it finishes. Prompts without criteria produce work that is plausible but incomplete, because nothing defined when it was done.
Permission to ask instead of guess
This brief leaves room for interpretation, so the prompt tells the model to ask before inventing details. That converts a confidently wrong answer into a question you can actually answer.

What to replace

PlaceholderWhat to put there
{{role}}Your role.
{{frequency}}Your frequency.
{{tools}}Your tools.
{{failure_modes}}Your failure modes.
{{process}}Your process.

Check the output before you use it

  • Hand it to someone who has never done the task and watch. Every question they ask is a missing step.
  • Check each step has a way to confirm it worked.
  • Confirm the failure paths are documented, not just the happy path.

The same prompt for other models

Identical content, packaged the way each model reads most reliably.

ChatGPT

## Role

You are a senior writer and editor with a decade of experience in this exact form.

## Audience

This is for someone doing this for the first time, unsupervised. Pitch the level of detail, vocabulary, and assumed background at that reader specifically, not at a general audience.

## Context

Who does it: {{role}}. How often: {{frequency}}. Tools involved: {{tools}}. What goes wrong: {{failure_modes}}.

## Task

Write a standard operating procedure for {{process}}.

## Constraints

- Number every step. One action per step.
- State how to tell each step worked before moving on.
- Say what to do when a step fails, not just what to do when it succeeds.
- Name who to escalate to and when.
- Write in plain, direct prose. Do not restate the prompt, and do not open with a throat-clearing sentence.
- Vary sentence length. Do not begin consecutive sentences with the same word or structure.
- Do not invent facts, statistics, quotations, or attributed opinions.

## Output format

Respond in Markdown. Use descriptive headings, and keep paragraphs to three sentences or fewer.

## Success criteria

Before you finish, check the output against every item below and fix anything that fails.

- A new starter could complete this without asking anyone.

## Before you start

If anything above is unclear, or you are missing information you need, ask up to three specific clarifying questions before producing any output. Do not invent facts, names, numbers, sources, or quotations to fill a gap — if you do not know something, say so plainly.

Now, write a standard operating procedure for {{process}}.

Gemini

**Task**

Write a standard operating procedure for {{process}}.

**Role**

You are a senior writer and editor with a decade of experience in this exact form.

**Audience**

This is for someone doing this for the first time, unsupervised. Pitch the level of detail, vocabulary, and assumed background at that reader specifically, not at a general audience.

**Context**

Who does it: {{role}}. How often: {{frequency}}. Tools involved: {{tools}}. What goes wrong: {{failure_modes}}.

**Constraints**

- Number every step. One action per step.
- State how to tell each step worked before moving on.
- Say what to do when a step fails, not just what to do when it succeeds.
- Name who to escalate to and when.
- Write in plain, direct prose. Do not restate the prompt, and do not open with a throat-clearing sentence.
- Vary sentence length. Do not begin consecutive sentences with the same word or structure.
- Do not invent facts, statistics, quotations, or attributed opinions.

**Output format**

Respond in Markdown. Use descriptive headings, and keep paragraphs to three sentences or fewer.

**Success criteria**

Before you finish, check the output against every item below and fix anything that fails.

- A new starter could complete this without asking anyone.

**Before you start**

If anything above is unclear, or you are missing information you need, ask up to three specific clarifying questions before producing any output. Do not invent facts, names, numbers, sources, or quotations to fill a gap — if you do not know something, say so plainly.

Now, write a standard operating procedure for {{process}}.

Common questions

How detailed should an SOP be?
Detailed enough that someone unfamiliar could follow it without asking. The reliable test is to watch a new person use it — every question they ask marks a step the author knew and did not write down.
What is usually missing from an SOP?
The failure paths. Procedures document what to do when everything works, which is the case that needs the least documentation. What to do when step four returns an error is what people actually need.
Which AI model is best for writing a standard operating procedure?
All of them handle this; what changes is the packaging. This page shows the same prompt written for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini. Claude follows XML-delimited structure most reliably, ChatGPT works best with markdown headings, and Gemini prefers the task stated before the material. The content of the prompt is identical in each.
Can I change this prompt for my own situation?
Yes, and you should. Replace the placeholders with your own details, then open it in the builder to add context specific to you. The builder scores what you supply and tells you exactly which missing piece would improve it most.
Why does this prompt include rules I did not ask for?
Because writing tasks carry requirements that experienced practitioners apply automatically and rarely write down. The compiler adds them so the output does not fail on something obvious. Every added rule is listed on the how it works page.

Browse all ready-made prompts, the full prompt library, or read the guides.